BERNSTEIN & FRIEDLAND, P.C.

Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. – Los Angeles Employment Counsel – Legal Blog

A Resource for Los Angeles Area Employees and Employers Interested in Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation, and Unpaid Wage and Overtime News

California Supreme Court Addresses Work Product Protection Applicable to Witness Identities and Recorded Interviews

In Coito v. Superior Ct., 54 Cal. 4th 480 (2012), the California Supreme Court addressed whether, and to what extent, the following items of evidence were entitled to attorney work product protection:  (1) recordings of witness interviews conducted by investigators employed by counsel, and (2) information concerning the identity of witnesses from whom counsel obtained statements. As to the interview recordings, the Court held that they

Read More »
July 3, 2012

United States Supreme Court Holds Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives Are Not Entitled to Overtime Pay

In Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 132 S. Ct. 2156 (2012), the United States Supreme Court concluded that under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the plaintiffs, pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSR) who spent much of their time meeting with physicians and encouraging them to prescribe the defendant’s pharmaceutical products to their patients, were not entitled to overtime pay. Under the FLSA, employers are not required

Read More »
June 25, 2012

Ninth Circuit Dismisses Nurse’s Disability Discrimination Claim, Finding That Where Regular Attendance is an Essential Function of the Job Position, Employee’s Disability-Induced Irregular Attendance was Fatal to Her Claim

In Samper v. Providence St. Vincent Med. Ctr., 675 F.3d 1233 (9th Cir. 2012), the Ninth Circuit stated: “This case tests the limits of an employer’s attendance policy.  Just how essential is showing up for work on a predictable basis?  In the case of a neo-natal intensive care nurse, we conclude that attendance really is essential.” In this case, the plaintiff worked for the defendant for eleven years

Read More »
May 1, 2012

California Supreme Court Issues Seminal Decision on Meal and Rest Breaks

After a long wait, the California Supreme Court finally issued its much-anticipated ruling in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Ct., 53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012), resolving several unanswered questions regarding employers’ obligations with respect to employee meal and rest breaks. First, the Supreme Court concluded that with respect to meal breaks, employers fulfill their obligations under the California Labor Code when they relieve their employees of

Read More »
April 20, 2012

Muslim Pakistani Employee’s Religious and National Origin Harassment Claims Allowed to Proceed to Trial

In Rehmani v. Superior Ct., 204 Cal. App. 4th 945 (2012), the California Court of Appeal overturned the trial court’s order granting summary adjudication to the plaintiff’s former employer, Ericsson, Inc., concluding that triable issues of fact existed as to the defendant’s liability for harassment.  Id. at 948. In this case, Ericsson fired the plaintiff after a human resources investigation concluded that he had sent two emails

Read More »
April 12, 2012

Stunning $167 Million Verdict to Plaintiff Alleging Sexual Harassment and Retaliation by Her Employer

A Sacramento jury in federal court has awarded more than $167 million to Ani Chopourian, who alleged that her former employer, Dignity Health (formerly known as Catholic Healthcare West), sexually harassed her and illegally retaliated against her for repeatedly complaining about patient and employee safety, abuse against women, and unsafe hospital conditions. In this case, the jury heard evidence that during the plaintiff’s employment with

Read More »
March 19, 2012

Recent Posts

Categories

DISCLAIMER

The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should not rely upon any information contained in this website for legal advice. Viewing or using this website is not intended to and shall not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. Emails or other forms of communication that you transmit to the firm will not create an attorney-client relationship and thus information contained in such communications may not be protected as privileged. Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. makes no representation, warranty or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this website or in links to other websites which is provided “as is,” nor about the outcome or result of any legal representation that might be undertaken by the firm. Your use of this website is at your own risk. You may use this website and its contents only for personal, non-commercial purposes. Neither Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. nor anyone acting on its behalf, will be liable under any circumstances for damages of any kind, including, without limitation, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, arising from the use of this website.

© 2023 Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. All rights reserved

Skip to content