As we approach the last few months of the year and plan ahead for 2023, we prepared this update to provide an overview of some of the latest legal developments and key new laws going into effect next year, some of which will require modifications to employment-related policies and practices in order for CA businesses to remain in compliance. Please note that this is not a
Does an employer need to reasonably accommodate an employee’s shift scheduling requirements to enable the employee to tend to the medical needs of his son? The court in Castro-Ramirez v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc., 2 Cal. App. 5th 1028 (Aug. 29, 2016), answered that question “yes.” In this case, the plaintiff had informed his manager upon hire that he had daily obligations at home related to
The California agency tasked with enforcing the state’s anti-discrimination, anti-harassment, and anti-retaliation laws, the Department of Fair Employment & Housing (DFEH), has recently implemented new regulations that will require California employers with five or more employees to revise their workplace policies and/or employee handbooks by April 1, 2016. Specifically, the regulations require employers to say more to employees about the topics of anti-discrimination and anti-harassment
Plaintiff Rosario Juarez sued her former employer, AutoZone Stores Inc., for demoting her and ultimately terminating her after she announced her pregnancy in 2005. According to Juarez, when she informed her district manager that she was expecting, the manager responding by saying, “Congratulations…I guess. I feel sorry for you.” Juarez alleged that the company subsequently doubled her assigned list of tasks, making her work day substantially
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has announced its largest jury verdict in the federal agency’s history–$240 million–in a case in which an Iowa jury found Hill County Farms liable for subjecting 32 men with intellectual disabilities to substantial abuse and discrimination. According to an EEOC press release, available here, the agency presented evidence that for years, the owners and staffers of the defendant company “subjected the
In Sanchez v. Swissport, Inc., — Cal. App. — (Cal. App. 2d Dist. Feb. 21, 2013), the California Court of Appeals for the Second District held that California employers’ obligations as to employees requiring medical leaves of absence caused by pregnancy-related disabilities do not end at allowing a four-month leave of absence–and can instead include permitting employees suffering from pregnancy-related disabilities significantly more leave time. In
The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should not rely upon any information contained in this website for legal advice. Viewing or using this website is not intended to and shall not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. Emails or other forms of communication that you transmit to the firm will not create an attorney-client relationship and thus information contained in such communications may not be protected as privileged. Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. makes no representation, warranty or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this website or in links to other websites which is provided “as is,” nor about the outcome or result of any legal representation that might be undertaken by the firm. Your use of this website is at your own risk. You may use this website and its contents only for personal, non-commercial purposes. Neither Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. nor anyone acting on its behalf, will be liable under any circumstances for damages of any kind, including, without limitation, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, arising from the use of this website.
© 2023 Bernstein & Friedland, P.C. All rights reserved